Tuesday, June 15, 2021

S​teps To An American Voting Rights Act

 Steps ​To An American Voting Rights Act

The right to vote for Americans is currently in jeopardy due to the continued perpetuation that the 2020 election was stolen (the "Big Lie") by Donald Trump and many in the Republican Party. A massive effort is underway in state legislatures across the county to place restrictions and processes on voting and elections to make it more difficult for certain groups (minorities, students, poor and others) and to exercise various legislative controls and interventions in actual election results.

My last posting, "Voting Rights Plus Everything Else" discussed the fact that voting rights is the one issue that overshadows all other issues and is the foundational issue to American democracy. I emphasized that it ​is ​so easy to get distracted with the many other issues that are popular including Climate Change, Infrastructure, Health Care, Police Reform, Immigration, Civil Rights, Gun Control, SCOTUS Packing, New Statehoods, Campaign Finance & Elec
tion Reform,
Taxes, Minimum Wage, Women's Rights, etc., etc.

Many of these issues will take months or years to ​debate and ​resolve, ​and will take time to garner ​full and adequate public and Congressional support. But, voting 
rights must be resolved immediately and remains the most critical issue to provide a path to save our democracy and provide solutions to so many other issues going forward. With Democrats in narrow control of the House, Senate and Executive Office there seems to be a lack of that serious focus and urgency being paid to this most critical issue. The urgency relates to the absolute necessity of overriding significant Republican efforts at blatant voter suppression in their hopes of winning back the House and Senate in the upcoming midterm elections, now less than 17 months away. Even if measures were passed yesterday they will take time to effectuate within federal and state governments and will likely be subject to preliminary court challenges, interpretations and clarifications.

Many Democrats including President Biden seem to be riding high on the current wave of normalcy and have lost sight of the fact that it will all come crashing down in an instant if a few votes are transferred in the midterm elections. Many astute political observers are predicting that an upcoming Republican takeover of the House is highly probable in the midterm elections. Additionally, Democrats seem to be ignoring the political reality that they do not currently have 60 votes or even 50 votes in the Senate to override a filibuster or institute filibuster changes to address any of their issues; including voting rights. 

Also as part of the current political reality many Democrats seem unwilling to accept that many of the items on their campaign and election reforms wish list are simply not ripe for mainstream public acceptance at this time. What is ripe and seems to have widespread public acceptance is making sure that the public is afforded an easy, convenient and fair opportunity to vote and that new and proposed Republican voter suppression efforts are overturned and prohibited in the future. [Opinion piece on Democrats dilemma.]

There are three major components to the voting rights legislative debate: (1) Elements of the 800+ page For The People Act (H.R.1/S.1); (2) Elements of & proposed amendments of S.4263, the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act; and (3) Necessary amendments & clarifications to the Electoral Count Act of 1887.

A​s part of the voting rights Congressional debate​ as well as considerations of other legislative issues there has been considerable attention to the filibuster and possible "carve out" exceptions, modifications or outright elimination. Discussions on the future of the filibuster vary depending on the issue and are politically complex and not easily resolved. The filibuster establishes an arbitrary, non-Constitutional Senatorial rule requiring at least 60 votes to approve legislation. It does not apply to budgetary matters under an exception known as "reconciliation" nor to administrative, judicial and Supreme Court appointments under carved out exceptions which have been approved by both Democrats and Republicans under separate actions by a simple majority vote. The Senate reconciliation process may be utilized only three times per year (some exceptionsfor spending, revenue, and the federal debt limit​ matters. ​

As it relates to voting rights, it is critically important to emphasize the political reality that currently exists. The reconciliation process does not apply and Democrats do not currently have 60 votes to override a Republican filibuster or 50 votes to effect a change in the filibuster rule. Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV), Kyrsten Senema (D-AZ) and a few other Democrats have raised serious objections to eliminating or carving out exceptions to the filibuster. The objectors have suggested on occasion that they might be willing to consider some modification to the filibuster rule but they have not agreed to any specifics. The strong objections are primarily based on two reasons: (1) a belief that bipartisanship in decision making is good and necessary in the U.S. Senate; and (2) when party control changes Democrats will be subject to majority Republican decisions with no ability to stop them. It should be noted that Democrats have used the filibuster many times in the past to stop Republican actions when they have been the minority party. [Summary of current political debate.]

While some Democrats wish the party could unite and pass voting rights legislation by a majority vote and others seem to be acting as if the political reality does not exist, that simply is not possible. Democrats must start with a basic acceptance of the current political reality; otherwise there is no hope. As part of that reality they must proceed with the assumption that they will likely not receive 10 Republican votes to override a filibuster. Considering the timing and urgency of the matter, that leaves only one option: they must work exceedingly hard in negotiations to craft a bill that has nearly 100% of Senate Democratic and Executive Office support and addresses policy concerns of potentially objecting members and proceed to convince all party members of the extreme importance and the fact that there is no other option other than passing the bill with 50 Democratic votes and most likely the tie breaking vote of the Vice President. [UPDATE 6/16/21: Manchin outlines policy requirements for For The People Act] & [Manchin says 55 vote filibuster might be possible]

As mentioned above, the matter is exceedingly urgent, it is the most important issue facing the Biden Administration and the Democratic party, and it is one of the most complex legislative construction endeavors in the history of the country. It requires all hands on board and an intensive effort on the part of all Democratic members and the President.

The following is a starting point and step by step outline of actions that could lead to passage of voting rights legislation. 

Start with the fact that Senators Manchin and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) wrote a letter to Congressional members on May 17, 2021. They put their feelings and positions in writing to their colleagues. They must be held accountable. In their letter they said: 

“Protecting Americans’ access to democracy has not been a partisan issue for the past 56 years, and we must not allow it to become one now. . . Inaction is not an option. Congress must come together — just as we have done time and again — to reaffirm our longstanding bipartisan commitment to free, accessible, and secure elections for all… We can do this. We must do this.”  

​This letter must be the foundation of the negotiating effort and ​launch pad for what must be done. Senator Manchin's insistence on bipartisanship and preservation of the filibuster must be presented to him directly and challenged with his own words -- "We can do this. We must do this." Manchin must be forced to confront his own dilemma of the reality that if Congress will not come together then what is the option if as he says, "Inaction is not an option."

The two Senators point out and remind in their heartfelt letter that:

​"​Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006 passed the United States Senate 98-0 without a single dissenting vote. Protecting Americans’ access to democracy has not been a partisan issue for the past 56 years, and we must not allow it to become one now.​.."​

I would suggest the following steps to passing voting rights legislation.  

1. ​H.R.1/S.1 For The People Act

​This 800-page bill comprising a Democratic wish list of election and campaign reform issues must be strip​ped​-down and focus​ed​ on just making it easy, convenient and fair for people to vote and to override Republican voter suppression efforts. ​Other sections, many of which are very important but not essential to the preservation of our democracy, need​ to be deferred to a later time for​ further discussion and consideration.Increasing voter access via polling places and drop boxes, allowing for no-excuse mail voting, at least 15 days of early voting,​ ​eliminating nonsense restrictions like water to voters, ​polling intimidators, etc. and overriding other Republican suppression efforts must be included. Other sections, particularly controversial campaign financing sections and even gerrymandering sections are still highly controversial, even among some conservative Democrats and Independents, and should be debated later. 

​Additionally, there has been recent discussion of important sections ​that need to be added to the bill nullifying Republican efforts that may provide for legislative overrides of election results or other interference in the state election certification process. Overall the bill should assure that elections are free, easy, convenient and secure for the voting public.

The bill and proposed amendments​ by Senator Manchin​, with 47 cosponsors, is designed to address the SCOTUS concerns (2013 Shelby County v Holder decision) of preclearance based on old data (i.e. decades-old misdeeds, rather than current discriminatory practices) and discrimination against certain states (i.e. unequal burdens on certain states) by requiring preclearance for all 50 states.​ ​This bill needs to be finally negotiated with amendments among Democrats. [Discussion of Manchin proposal & relation to other efforts.]

Note: Now there is a new urgency with the July 1, 2021, Supreme Court decision in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee which will further limit challenges under the Voting Rights Act. [Article on the decision.]

3. Electoral Count Act ​of 1887

​An article in The Bulwark has exposed the many faults of this 1887 and the serious need to update and clarify this act ​to ​among other things, ​exclude any Congressional override of certified state elections.​ This must be included as part of the overall effort to address voting rights. ​This is the Act that calls for the January 6th meeting and the supposed perfunctory Congressional approval which precipitated the insurrection.​ The Act is a literal joke and a nightmare of legal mumbo-jumbo which is discussed in this article. I ​think many people simply assumed that this was ​somehow ​addressed in HR1/S1. ​

4. Combine 1,2, & 3 into one new ​American ​Voting Rights ​Act

​5. Launch a major, nationwide educational campaign on the new bill​

6. Put the bill to a vote of the Senate​ before Labor Day​ 

Encourage willing and concerned Republicans to join in the effort with their support.​

​7. If Republicans filibuster the bill carve out a “voting rights exception” to the filibuster.

​8. Convince ​& Hold Accountable ​Manchin and ​any ​other doubters 
T​here is no other way ​if you are to hold to your statement that, "We must do this​... ​Inaction is not an option." ​T​o save our democracy and ​preserve ​free and fair elections​ for the public the Act must be pass​ed​ with ​at least ​50 Democratic votes + VP​ if needed (i.e. if no Republican votes)​.​ 

UPDATE: From (CNN) Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia said Wednesday (6/16/21) he wouldn't rule out supporting S1 -- the sweeping elections overhaul bill Congress is considering -- and is open to backing it as long as some changes are made.

Read Manchin's proposed changes below, obtained by CNN. Manchin's proposal is detailed and was immediately supported by Stacey Abrams and immediately rejected by Senator Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) who said he expected all Republican Senators to vote against it. [See GOP reaction article].

UPDATE#2: On June 22, 2021, the U.S. Senate voted on a cloture motion to end the filibuster and proceed with discussion of the For The People Act which would require 60 votes to continue. All 50 Republican Senators voted to stop discussion and all 50 Democratic Senators voted to proceed. Discussion of Voting Rights in the U.S. Senate is stalled for the time being. [See article]

UPDATE#3: (7/28/21) Finally, months too late, as reported by the Washington Post, a small group of Senate Democrats convened to hammer out a revised voting rights bill that might be released as soon as this week after Republicans filibustered the sweeping, For the People Act last month. Reportedly, the bill will include Senator Manchin's concerns addressed in his 3-page framework and the adoption strategy seems to be headed toward "a small carve out on filibuster for voting rights." [See the WP newsletter report] [7/30/21, Politico article on new voting rights bill] [7/30/21 ABC News article summarizing recent progress]

UPDATE#4: (8/12/21) Brief article summarizing the urgency & uncertainty of Democrats' ability in addressing Voting Rights and therein the future of democracy in the U.S. Nothing is more important.
Democrats Are Running Out of Time to Protect Voting Rights, Mother Jones, by Ari Berman
As Republicans pass state-level restrictions and prepare to gerrymander, national legislation is stalled.

UPDATE#5: (8/24/21) In May 2021, Senators Joe Manchin(D-WV) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) wrote to the House & Senate leadership reminding that:

" Since enactment, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 has been reauthorized and amended five times with large, bipartisan majorities. Most recently, The Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006 passed the United States Senate 98-0 without a single dissenting vote. Protecting Americans’ access to democracy has not been a partisan issue for the past 56 years, and we must not allow it to become one now." [Emphasis added]

Bipartisanship has now left the voting rights issue. On August 24, 2001, H R 4, the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, passed the U.S. House of Representatives completely along party lines, with 219 Democrats in favor and all 212 Republicans opposed. It is expected that the bill will now face steep Republican opposition in the U.S. Senate. Democrats say the bill would make it more difficult for states to restrict future voting access and Republicans say the bill is federal overreach into the state's role in election processes. In June Senate Republicans blocked approval of H.R.1, the For The People Act the other major voting rights bill sponsored by Democrats [See Update#2 above].

UPDATE#6: (9/8/21) ​
(1) Dems: Save the bipartisan hard infrastructure & #VotingRights bills by linking them & dropping the $3.5T reconciliation bill until after the Midterms. Dems & Biden need a big boost for Midterms. 

(2) Democrats, you must accept the fact that the $3.5T soft infrastructure reconciliation proposal is not going to pass this fall. Drastic cuts will only weaken the programs. It needs much more development, discussion and public education. You can't expect the public to accept such a complex bill which has not even been fully drafted or released yet. Further pursuit now is only going to delay or deny the hard infrastructure and voting rights legislation which will doom Midterm success. The future of democracy and critical legislation depends on Democrats keeping and expanding Congressional control.

(3) In the HOUSE, Speaker Pelosi must call for the preparation of a substitute for H.R.4, (John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2021, passed 8/24/21)) to include elements of HR1, & the Electoral Count Act which are acceptable to all Democrats including Senator Manchin & other Democratic moderates. At this point, Democrats must accept all of the voting rights provisions that can be approved by all Democrats. Other desired voting rights provisions can be worked on following the 2022 Midterms. The Substitute Voting Rights bill should be linked to the bipartisan $1.2T "Hard Infrastructure" that passed the Senate with 19 Republican votes. The House should pass the linked bills and send them to the Senate.

(4) In the SENATE; Senate Majority Leader Schumer should bring the linked Infrastructure & Voting Rights bills up for a vote. There should be an incentive for at least some of the 19 Republicans to support the combined package & all Democratic Senators should be supportive because the bills include their previously approved Infrastructure votes & their recommendations for Voting Rights legislation. Only 10 Republicans are needed. If there are not 10 Republicans, Democratic Senators MUST carve-out a Voting Rights exception to the filibuster and pass the combined package with 51 votes. The public will know that they tried to include Republicans to support critical Infrastructure needs and Voting Rights for ALL voters.

(5) On September 14, 2021, Senate Democrats introduced the Freedom to Vote Act. Here is Senator Klobuchar's summary: https://tinyurl.com/3w579mcd
Here is the full text: https://tinyurl.com/f4zn3e2

Democrats should now link the new Freedom to Vote bill to HR4 (John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2021), a revised Electoral Count Act (the source of the January 6 insurrection) & the "Hard" Infrastructure bill & pass the package NOW! All Senate Democrats are now on board.

Democrats should give the Senate GOP a chance to vote for the whole package. Nineteen (19) of them voted previously for the "Hard" Infrastructure package. If they refuse to find a minimum of 10 Republican Senators to support the package; Democrats should immediately pass the Hard Infrastructure package via reconciliation & the Voting Rights package by a Filibuster Carve Out exception.

Senate Democratic Moderates should support the "carve out" because Republicans will have been given an opportunity to support the infrastructure package which they previously approved and a very basic Voting Rights package to preserve the rights and freedoms for Americans to vote. Voters must be reminded that Republicans were willing to deny the public critically needed infrastructure and basic voting rights for pure political "party over country" power.

Democrats in turn must drop their insistence to link the hard infrastructure package to their $3.5 trillion "soft/social" infrastructure package. While the $3.5T package contains many important and beneficial programs it has barely been drafted and contains many complex details. The public and decision makers need to have more time to develop, discuss & understand this important legislation. Work on  social" infrastructure package  can begin immediately following the passage of hard infrastructure and voting rights legislation which is essential in advance of the 2022 Midterms.

Epilogue #1: (6/23/21) Unfortunately, Democrats have skipped some critical steps in the process and have basically taken Step #1; put it to a vote -- Step #6 -- and proved that Republicans would continue to filibuster the bill with their unanimous 50 votes against cloture.

All is not lost yet, but it is essential that Democrats quickly take stock and accelerate actions to complete the missing steps. 

The three major elements of voting rights legislation (listed above) must be combined and carefully crafted to address the most critical aspects necessary to override the widespread Republican Party voter suppression laws and legislation underway in statehouses across the country. This new American Voting Rights Act must have 100% support from all Senate Democrats and the Biden Administration. 

Then proceed with Steps 5, 6, 7, & 8. Step #5 is exceedingly important and must be thorough and comprehensive.

Epilogue #​2​: (​12/2/21Unfortunately, Democratic leadership and POTUS have let the major reforms needed on voting rights​ and voter suppression slip away. 

T​he leadership, distracted by infrastructure and Build Back Better, failed to prioritize and deal with the urgency of the lynchpin of American democracy -- the right to vote -- upon which all other issues ​depend. 

While the GOP has been emphatic and successful in frustrating and altering that right to their advantage, ​POTUS, with the power of the bully pulpit, should have taken control​ with a vengeance to defend that fundamental right; including the critical rationale and need to carve out an exception to the Senate filibuster rule in order to enact reforms.

H​e should have prioritized and explained the importance of voting rights above all else. He should have quashed the ​nonsensical internal bickering ​within his party and presented the public with​ relentless,​ hard hitting, flag waving oratory​ to save the U.S. democracy. He should have also individually dealt seriously with any unreasonable obstruction or interference by members of his party.  

​Instead, he let it get out of hand​ and has placed the future of U.S. democracy on the brink. Even if ​Democrats were to pass some reform legislation now; it's probably too late to be effective against a barrage of GOP lawsuits that ​would delay or halt implementation​ prior to the​ November 8, 2022​ Midterm elections. Those elections will likely determine the future of democracy in America.

​Additionally, it appears that even the legislation that is being proposed does not address the intrinsic legal ambiguity within the antiquated Electoral Count Act of 1887 which was the root cause and erroneous justification for the January 6, 2021 insurrection and assault on the American democracy.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: See comments below.

Virus-free. www.avg.com

Thursday, April 22, 2021

Voting Rights Plus Everything Else

There are so many issues it's easy to get distracted -- Climate Change, Infrastructure, Health Care, Police Reform, Immigration, Civil Rights, Gun Control, SCOTUS Packing, New Statehoods, Campaign Finance & Election Reform, Taxes, Minimum Wage, Women's Rights, etc., etc.

Yet, there is one issue; just one issue, that overshadows them all. The most foundational issue, common to all, is voting rights. With sensible, uniform voting rights for all citizens that encourage voting and don't inhibit it, who knows how we might address all these critical issues. If we suppress the right to vote we suppress the will of the public; and if we suppress the will of the public, we suppress or distort the will to address these issues. Currently, on some issues there is no overarching public or political will to address the issue and so it will not be adequately addressed. On other issues there may be strong public will but, no overarching political will -- again, the issue will not be adequately addressed. If voters are not inhibited or disenfranchised in some way, the all important public will can be expressed in each new election (local, state, & federal). Until voter suppression is stopped and the public is allowed to freely express its will through voting for political leadership and direction little, if any, progress will be made on all of the major issues facing the country.

There is no more important issue than expanding voter rights and stopping blatant voter suppression.

Take climate change for example. . .

The challenge to address climate change is particularly difficult because of its global nature, over which we have only limited and indirect control. It’s doubtful the challenge will ever be met. However, if we focus on issues within the United States and under our government control, addressing climate change is no different than the many other critical issues that must be addressed and solved. While there is no specific proposal to address U.S. involvement in the issue, there is general public support for doing something. That public support may change dramatically depending on a specific proposal, however, there is no clear political support among the existing mix of Congressional legislators so it's highly unlikely that anything will be done. Free and uninhibited voter expression in upcoming elections could change that dynamic.

And how about infrastructure which we can more directly control. . .

On infrastructure there appears to be broad, bipartisan support for President Biden's fairly specific proposed $2.2 trillion infrastructure plan. Yet despite the public support, political support is fairly split and the opposition is entrenched based on definitional and funding issues. 

What if Democrats called the Republican’s bluff? Republicans in Congress continue to say they are for infrastructure, but Democrats define it too broadly, their proposal is too big, and they propose increases in the corporate income tax rate and perhaps taxes only on persons making more than $400,000, all of which they are against. 

As an alternative strategy to meet the public will, why don’t Democrats say to Republicans, tell us the parts of the infrastructure bill that you think are overreach or not germane. If Republicans won’t officially identify their objections, Democrats should do it based on various, on-record comments from Republican leaders. It appears that a small group of Republicans have rallied around a reduced infrastructure bill (conforming to their definition) of about $600 to $800 billion. Then, repackage the bill to near Republican standards and call it Infrastructure (Part A). Now, bring the Part A bill to the floor for a vote and see how many votes it gets or if Republicans filibuster it. 

If it passes, it will at least be a starting point and Biden and Congressional Democrats can claim victory — they compromised and got something done on a huge issue. Democrats also should develop and and widely publicize their Part B bill and highlight the additional features that go beyond the Part A bill. If the Part A bill doesn't pass (I can almost guarantee that), Biden and Dems can expose the blatant hypocrisy of Republicans and their obstructionist agenda and focus solely on political power. If the Biden infrastructure bill (Part A&B) continues to be popular Democrats should attempt to pass it by whatever means and, if necessary, expose opponents to the public will in the midterm election.

By not focusing like a laser on the most critical and foundational issue of all -- voting rights -- I am seriously worried that Democrats are going to undermine what may be a one-time opportunity to save democracy as we know it. Despite the idiocy and corruption of the Trump years he continues to command control of the GOP (a factoid I simply don't understand). In typical Democratic fashion, with the narrowest margin of political control, Democrats are falling into their self-made trap of ideological overreach, lack of focus and confusing communications. This shortsightedness gives Republicans all the buzz words and soundbites they need to spread lies and disinformation throughout the electorate. Typically, Democrats try to push too much, too fast, beyond the middle ground of basic, widely accepted support for necessary reforms -- the so-called Overton window.

It is a time when filibuster reform (not elimination) and plain and simple "voting rights" (exclusive of distracting issues like campaign financing & election reforms) should be the number one priorities. Voting rights in particular is the critical underpinning upon which all other reforms depend; now and in the future. I'm afraid Democrats are not focused on the prize and instead are laying the groundwork for the Republican barrage of "see, I told you so" -- misleading attacks on spending & taxes, packing SCOTUS, reparations, green deals, defunding police, 2nd amendment rights, new statehoods, and other highly controversial and complicated issues that are all important but scare the electorate, do not have overwhelming public support and dominate the news media and overshadow the basic priorities. 

Democrats cannot even muster unanimous support from their own Party on many of these issues and as the 2022 midterm election approaches there is no time to waste. If Dems lose their narrow political control in the midterms, all is lost. Filibuster reform and voting rights legislation to stop voter suppression are essential to any future Democratic agenda and must be accomplished well in advance of November 2022, to allow time to implement reforms. I don't see a focused effort to make that happen.  

###

Footnote #1:

Several Republicans Senators have now put forth a $568 billion counter proposal to the Biden $2.2 trillion plan [https://tinyurl.com/r3rbd6w]. The GOP members include:

Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) along with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), and Senators Roger Wicker (R-MS), Pat Toomey (R-PA), Mike Crapo (R-ID) and John Barrasso (R-WY), and Mitt Romney.( R-UT).

The following is a listing of GOP v. Biden proposals for common infrastructure items. The numbers in parenthesis indicate the middle "compromise" between the two proposals. All numbers are in billions and the GOP proposed number is indicated first. See a comparison of the two plans: https://tinyurl.com/efkmpmz2

Roads and bridges 299 - 205 ($252B); 
Public transit systems 61 - 85 ($73B); 
Rail 20 - 80 ($50B)
Drinking water & wastewater infrastructure 35 - 101 ($68B)
Ports & inland waterways 17 - 17 ($17B)
Airports 44 - 25 ($34.5B)
Safety 13 - 0 ($6.5B)
Broadband infrastructure 65 - 100 ($82.5)
Water storage 14 - 0 ($7B)

As it turns out the two plans are only $45 billion apart on generally common items ($568 v. $613). If you split the differences on the common items a compromised total would be about $590 billion.

Consistent with my suggestion above I would propose that President Biden and Senate Democrats immediately package the compromised numbers on the common items into the Infrastructure Part A bill. Currently it is proposed to finance the effort over 15 years with a hike in the corporate income tax rate to 28%, up from 21%. The Administration could also call for a compromise here also -- to say 25%.

Democrats should call the Republican's bluff and put the Part A completely compromised bill to a vote in the Senate & see if the GOP will support it (I doubt it). If it fails to pass, Democrats should immediately pass the bill through reconciliation, claim their victory for getting something done for the American people, and emphasize the GOP's refusal to compromise in the upcoming midterm elections.

President Biden and Congressional Democrats should then package the remaining elements of the proposal into a Part B bill to include their items such as electric vehicles, climate change, elderly infrastructure via caregiving & caregivers, clean manufacturing & rural community energy, energy efficient housing, research and development, educational infrastructure, workforce development, and VA hospitals. Democrats should work separately to build and gain public support for these items.
###

Footnote #2:

Mitch McConnell made SCOTUS appointments AN EXCEPTION to the filibuster. If Dems can rally 50 votes on issues, Chuck Schumer should make #VotingRights; U.S. #Insurrection; & #CivilRights AN EXCEPTION. #filibuster #FilibusterOrDemocracy #bipartisanship

NOTHING WILL CHANGE FOR THE BETTER -- gun laws, climate change, police practices, abortion laws, the filibuster, infrastructure, minimum wage, civil rights, health care -- IF THE PUBLIC IS DENIED VOTING RIGHTS! Fix it now! #VotingRights tinyurl.com/99vhav5s

Sen. Joe Manchin said, "You have to have faith there's 10 good people." WRONG Joe; Only 6! Joe, it's time to wake up. You can't compromise with liars, tricksters & traitors. Now what? #Congress #bipartisanship #Filibuster #filibusterreform #Senate tinyurl.com/386rztac

Thursday, March 18, 2021

What Goes Around Comes Around

Back in 2016, as the Obama Administration was coming to a close and before the country experienced the trauma of the Trump Administration, I did a post that urged then Vice President Joe Biden to exercise an important duty of the Vice President -- i.e. issuing an advisory opinion about internal Senate procedure. As the old saying goes in politics, "What goes around comes around." So here we go again debating whether we should once again change the filibuster rule in the U.S. Senate. 

Although Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) now claims a change would ruin the integrity of what was once considered “the world's greatest deliberative body,” both parties have changed this Senate rule before when it suited their political ambitions at the time. As the rule has been chipped away, misused, twisted and distorted in recent years, maybe it's time to put it to bed or develop a workable replacement. As it currently stands it is one of the most destructive and divisive components of Congressional decision-making. It has led to an untenable and undemocratic trend of roller coaster governance by Executive Order. It is not a Constitutional requirement; it is simply a Senate rule that may be changed by a simple majority vote of the Senate. Unfortunately, V.P. Biden did not follow up on my request, but it still seems timely. So I'll pass it along again.


July 12, 2016

V.P. Biden Could Lead Gridlock Reform

An Open Letter To Vice President Biden



Mr. Vice President, now is the time for you to 
exercise one of your important duties.


Dear Mr. Vice President,

The Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law, a nonpartisan law and policy institute that seeks to improve our systems of democracy and justice, has indicated that “Although often overlooked, one of the duties of the vice president is to act as president of the Senate, including issuing advisory opinions about internal Senate procedure.”1

I am writing to you to remind that you are in a very unique position at a critical point in our nation’s history to issue an historic Advisory Opinion on internal Senate procedures that could be a highlight of your legacy and a manifesto to challenge and guide the future operations of the United States Senate.

First of all, as President of the U.S. Senate you are in the foremost position to issue such a manifesto. Secondly, your 36 year career as an active U.S. Senator, combined with nearly 8 years as Vice President and Senate President, has given you a perspective unmatched by any individual. Thirdly, your apparent retirement from elected office, gives you a credibility and neutrality which is necessary to speak on a controversial issue that demands bipartisanship, yet defies resolution because of its powerful political scope that benefits both major political parties. Finally, as the Obama Administration draws to a close and a new Presidency has yet to be decided, and a new Congressional session looms, the timing could not be better to set the stage for a new era Senatorial reform.

As you and all WashingtonDC insiders know well, certain Senate procedures and rules are a major contributor to governmental gridlock and dysfunction. The excessive increase in the so-called “silent filibuster”; the arcane procedure known as a Senatorial “hold”; and the ability of Senate Leadership and Committee Chairs to ignore Constitutionally-mandated functions (advise and consent) because there are no specified procedural time limits (e.g. Supreme Court appointment), are a few examples of rules and procedures that demand changes.

Some will argue that such changes require a two-thirds vote of the Senate, but that argument has been dispelled by both Republicans and Democrats.

Again, citing the Brennan Center, “The Constitution nowhere requires a two-thirds vote for changing Senate rules and does not even mention filibusters. The Constitution states that ‘each house may determine the rules of its proceedings,’ and the document requires a two-thirds vote only for impeachments, expelling a member, ratifying treaties, overriding presidential vetoes, and proposing constitutional amendments. There is simply no reason to believe that the framers of the Constitution thought a two-thirds vote could be required for the Senate (or the House) to change its rules. The straightforward inference is that, as a constitutional matter, only a simple majority is required.”2

Without going into the details of these extreme extra-parliamentary practices that both parties have self-imposed on House & Senate procedures, it is these very practices that have led, in large part, to the current dysfunctional government and the increasing public unrest.

It is my opinion that if you dig deep into the search for solutions you can find it in the simple concept of "majority rule." For the last several decades inside political manipulation by both parties has undermined this basic concept, and as a result given rise to a devilish concept of "minority rule." This nightmarish concept defies compromise and feeds on government stagnation, obstruction and inaction on increasingly perplexing problems and issues that demand action -- that's why the public is mad – that’s why they have lost their trust and respect for government.

Not only do these practices grind decision making to a standstill, but they allow for increased leverage for lobbyists and moneyed influences. These practices are the "demons of democracy" and have led to the public’s perception that Congress is basically useless as a governing body – e.g. approval ratings less than 10%.

As Thomas Jefferson pointed out way back in 1809, "Where the law of the majority ceases to be acknowledged, there government ends, the law of the strongest takes its place, and life and property are his who can take them." He also said, "All... being equally free, no one has a right to say what shall be law for the others. Our way is to put these questions to the vote, and to consider that as law for which the majority votes."3

The “demons of democracy” have so distorted the democratic process envisioned by the Founders and the Constitution, as to make it unrecognizable. No elected President (Democrat, Republican or Independent) can achieve their stated or envisioned goals for the country because of these constraints. The result is that the majority public and winning candidate are denied any opportunity to see their vision actually implemented.

We must have trust in the majority rule system as it may not always deliver the results that we, as an individual, envision; however, if decisions are really bad, the majority corrects itself by changing direction. The founders believed in the concept of majority rule and we have now drifted away from that cornerstone.

Mr. Vice President, your leadership on this vital issue at this critical time can help turn the tide of what is becoming a dangerous decline in the public’s belief in our democratic form of government and our political leaders from both major parties. . .

Please use your position, experience and authority to address these critical issues in an Advisory Opinion on internal Senate procedures.