Thursday, June 20, 2019

Insanity Defined

Insanity Defined

No matter who's President, nothing gets done as long as Congressional gridlock and dysfunction persist. 

We cannot keep ignoring major issues, conducting sham executive oversight, or trying to develop unsustainable, one-party solutions to complex problems that will be overturned with the next change of power -- It's insane! Solutions exist. Legislators must be forced into real bipartisanship.

There will never be real legislative bipartisanship as long as one party controls all legislative committees. Equal membership on committees and strict compliance with so-called “regular order” would force compromise and unbiased oversight. 

Amended Congressional rules, requiring an equal number of members from each party, could result in forcing bipartisan legislation based on research, investigation, agreed to facts & data, unbiased staff analysis, equal, fair, comprehensive expert testimony, media scrutiny and extensive public input and transparency. By the time legislation advanced to a floor vote there would be a broad bipartisan coalition of legislators, experts, interest groups and the public to force a positive outcome.

Yes, it would be difficult. There would be temporary deadlocks, but eventual compromises would be reached. Compare it to what we have now!

The fact that Congress cannot effectively deal with the most pressing issues of our time -- infrastructure, health care, immigration, climate change, entitlements, etc. -- is at the core of the public's unrest with the political chaos and tribalism that exists. Additionally, objective, unbiased executive oversight is not possible under existing rules.

It’s time to force Congress to change the rules and truly put “Country Over Party.”

For additional information see my blog post.
https://t.co/s4AMQ1nAO5

See testimonials from Republicans & Democrats that have actually experienced Shared Legislative Power: 
https://tinyurl.com/y4eeg5z2

There is now a proven model process for bipartisanship; it only requires a willingness to end gridlock.

See the December 11, 2019, Update on the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress https://tinyurl.com/sffqwzg

Friday, May 17, 2019

Draft Impeachment Resolution DJT

Draft Impeachment Resolution DJT

[Please note this is not an official document, but is simply a hypothetical example]

As most persons are aware, the procedure for removal of a President is included in the U.S. Constitution and was envisioned by the Framers as a check against an out of control President that could represent a threat to the security and institution of the country and its people. The process contains two parts: the approval of the articles of impeachment by the U.S. House of Representatives; followed by a trial and conviction or acquittal in the U.S. Senate. Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 of the Constitution grants to the House of Representatives "the sole power of impeachment", and Article I, Section 3, Clause 6 grants to the Senate "the sole Power to try all Impeachments". Actual removal requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate.

Article II, Section. 4 set out the standard for impeachment, saying: "The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or "other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." 

According to the Constitutional Rights Foundation (CRF), a high crime is one that can only be done by someone in a unique position of authority, which is political in character, who does things to circumvent justice. 

The phrase "high crimes and misdemeanors" when used together was a common phrase at the time the U.S. Constitution was written and did not require any stringent or difficult criteria for determining guilt. . .The phrase was historically used to cover a very broad range of crimesIn Federalist No. 65, Hamilton explained impeachment. He defined impeachable offenses as “those offences which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or in other words from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself.”

Constitutional scholars have generally agreed that not all presidential misconduct is sufficient to constitute grounds for impeachment. . . . Because impeachment of a President is a grave step for the nation, it is predicated only upon conduct seriously incompatible with either the constitutional form and principles of our government or the proper performance of constitutional duties of the presidential office. Impeaching a president overturns an election and therefore a president should be impeached only for “serious assaults on the integrity of the processes of government,” or for “such crimes as would so stain a president as to make his continuance in office dangerous to public order.” [from CRF and Charles L. Black's book, "Impeachment: A Handbook", https://tinyurl.com/ldeg7qh]

The Constitutional Center indicates that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, indicated the “constitution [is] intended to endure for ages to come and, consequently, to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs.” Thus, the Center says, "In the context of impeachment, this means that the Constitution cannot be expected to specify in detail every ground on which impeachment is or is not permissible. . . the Constitution sets forth the general principle of impeachment and leaves its more specific definition to be developed by the House of Representatives and the Senate." [see https://tinyurl.com/y3g7zyme]

What I find disturbing is that the Democrats who currently control the U.S. House of Representatives seem so hesitant and reluctant to initiate the impeachment process despite the enormity of evidence in existence regrading the gross malfeasance of Donald J. Trump. Further, the Democratic leadership seems to be insistent that more and more evidence and facts are needed to move forward with the impeachment process. Additionally, House Democrats and the news media in general seem to be creating a popular impression that the impeachment process is incredibly complex and would be extremely time consuming, requiring months and months of further investigations and hearings.

In fact, Bill Clinton's impeachment resolution was introduced and narrowly passed within three (3) days. Yes, the actual proceedings took a few weeks but the House Judiciary Committee did not conduct further investigations of its own and basically accepted findings included in Special Prosecutor Ken Starr's report of his already completed extensive investigation. A situation that very nearly mirrors the recent completion of the Robert Mueller investigation.

With all of the above in mind, and the evidence and information currently in existence, I have taken the liberty to provide a first draft of an impeachment resolution for Donald J. Trump (based on the impeachment resolution for Bill Clinton). I would maintain that the resolution could be finalized and the notations of "attached details" could be quickly assembled with extensive documentation under each identified charge. Even allowing for the entire month of June to complete the resolution and supplemental materials, I am suggesting that the package be introduced and passed by the U.S. House of Representatives with an effective date of July 4, 2019. The resolution and articles of impeachment would then move to the U.S. Senate under the control of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) for a trial if initiated by Senator McConnell. If a trial were to proceed, all Senators would be on record with a vote on the resolution. There is not a specific Constitutional requirement that the Senate conduct a trial or do so within any specific time limit following a House impeachment vote. [see: https://tinyurl.com/y84eb5ym]


Articles of Impeachment Against Donald J. Trump 

   (House Resolution xxx, One Hundred Sixteenth (116) Congress)

                    CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
                   July 4, 2019.


           RESOLUTION

      Resolved, That 
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the United States 
Senate:

      Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of itself and of the people of the United States of America, against 
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America, in maintenance and support of its impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors.
                                                       
ARTICLE I

      In his conduct while President of the United States, 
Donald J. Trump, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the 
best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has willfully corrupted and manipulated the judicial process of the United States for his personal gain and exoneration, impeding the administration of justice
and jeopardizing the security, safety and well being of the United State:

      As summarized below and detailed in extensive attached information, Donald J. Trump, throughout the time of his Presidency, has repeatedly failed to uphold his oath of office and has on thousands of incidents failed to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth to the people of the United States of America and our friends and allies abroad. Contrary to that oath, Donald J. Trump has willfully provided, and encouraged others to provide false and misleading testimony and information to the American public, Members and Committees of Congress, and various foreign governments.

      In conducting these actions Donald J. Trump has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the Constitution and the people of the United States.

      Wherefore, Donald J. Trump, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United 
States
.

ARTICLE II

      In his conduct while President of the United States, 
Donald J. Trump, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the 
best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, and has to that end engaged personally, and through his subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or scheme designed to delay, impede, cover up, and conceal the existence of evidence
, testimony and information related to his alleged illegal activities and other high crimes and misdemeanors.

      The means used to implement this course of conduct 
and/or scheme(s) included one or more of the following 23 listed and documented acts presented here in no particular order:

1. 10 counts of alleged obstruction of justice included in the Mueller report [see attached details] (Note: Various obstruction charges would be subject to indictment were it not for the DOJ policy regarding indictment of a sitting President and the current AG's stance in support of that policy. (https://tinyurl.com/yy9pulz9)

2. 1,000+ [6/4/19] former federal prosecutors serving under both Republican and Democratic administrations confirming obstruction [details https://tinyurl.com/yy9pulz9]

3. Repeated and persistent lies to the American Public; most notably the Trump Tower Moscow deal, who would pay for proposed Mexican wall, and the results of the Mueller report [see attached details]

4. No separation of business and financial dealings from government business; emolument clause violations [see attached details]

5. Investigations and retribution against political enemies [see attached details]

6. Refusing to honor subpoenas and requests for information (RFIs) from Congress [see attached details]

7. Ordering & requesting administration staffers to commit crimes [see attached details]

8. Violating norms of protocols regarding communications between WH and DOJ/AG [see attached details]

9. Lying on Airforce 1 about Trump Tower meeting with Russians [see attached details]

10. Overseeing as Commander in Chief, false speculation about Iran escalating war efforts [see attached details]

11. Refusing, in direct violation of laws, to turn over tax returns to Congressional committee [see attached details]

12. Violating norms of protocol in terms of Presidential signals on stock market movements, i.e. gains and losses; especially considering personal, family benefit [see attached details]

13. Selective approvals (despite recommendations to the contrary) and disapproval of National Security Clearances for friends, family and political enemies [see attached details]

14. Accepting Putin assurances over National Security experts advice regarding election interference [see attached details]

15. Persistent strategy and actions designed to heighten divisiveness in the U.S. population [see attached details]

16. Advocating and insisting for a Mexican wall contrary to best alternative recommendation [see attached details]

17. Significant violations of law, norms and protocols in dealing with the Mexican and Central America immigration issue [see attached details]

18. Jeopardizing national security by misuse of cell phones, email and meeting arrangements with foreign governments by him and his family [see attached details]

19. Exuding a sexist, racist and bigotry attitude; most notably with Charlottesville; comments about Mexicans and Muslims, comments about interactions with women and lies and coverups in dealings with porn stars [see attached details]

20. Witness tampering & misuse of pardon power [see attached details]

21. The issuance of Muslim bans; a series of discriminatory executive orders and proclamations [see attached details]

22. International embarrassment and misrepresentation of the United States on the International stage [see attached details]

22. Releasing classified, top secret U.S. security information to the Russian government [see attached details]

23. Failing to provide leadership in a nationwide effort to insure the security and integrity of the election infrastructure in the country in light of findings of substantial interference of Russia in the 2016 election process. [see attached details]

     In all of this, Donald J. Trump has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the Constitution and the people of the United States. Wherefore, Donald J. Trump, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: Clerk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Note On Process & Timing: Impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton were initiated following the 1998, midterm election "lame duck" session of the outgoing 105th United States Congress. Unlike the case of the 1974 impeachment process against Richard Nixon, the committee hearings were perfunctory but the floor debate in the whole House was spirited on both sides. 

Somewhat similar to the Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller investigation, in the Clinton impeachment, Special Prosecutor Ken Starr had already completed an extensive investigation, the House Judiciary Committee conducted no investigations of its own into Clinton's alleged wrongdoing, and it held no serious impeachment-related hearings before the 1998 midterm elections.


The resolution, H. Res. 611 [see: https://tinyurl.com/mva9hcq], sponsored by Rep. Henry J. Hyde [R-IL-6] was Introduced on December 16, 1998 and narrowly passed by the full House of Representatives, 3 days later on December 19, 1998. Clinton was impeached on grounds of perjury to a grand jury (by a 228–206 vote) and obstruction of justice (by a 221–212 vote). Two other articles of impeachment failed including abuse of power. Clinton became the third sitting president in history against whom the House of Representatives initiated impeachment proceedings. [see: https://tinyurl.com/hfchwqs]


Additional Note: Note: Rep. Brad Sherman [D-CA-30], in fact, did introduce H. RES. 13 on January 3, 2019, on impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors. The resolution was referred to the House Judiciary Committee and has one cosponsor. [see: https://tinyurl.com/ybgz9tgu]

Saturday, January 5, 2019

Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress

[December 11, 2019. Please note the Process discussed in the update comment below that a committee with an equal number of Democratic and Republican members; that requires a 2/3 majority vote to approve recommendations; has nonpartisan staff with one budget and one office; and has all members cosponsoring the legislation results in a truly bipartisan effort. This is a good example of Shared Legislative Power (SLP), even with the extensive tribalism we are experiencing today. My point is we could make this real bipartisan process a requirement (House & Senate rule) for the development of all new legislation and oversight. As I have discussed; the option is what we have now -- Insanity.

By a vote of 418-12 (unheard of in today's political environment), the U.S. House of Representatives has established the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress as part of the House Democrats' new rules proposal.

Washington, D.C. – January 4, 2019. Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued this statement announcing that Congressman Derek Kilmer (D) of Washington State will chair the new Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress.

“It gives me great pride to appoint Congressman Derek Kilmer as the Chair of our new Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress.  Congressman Kilmer is an innovator and a pioneer, who has worked relentlessly to make the House more transparent and more responsive to the voices of Members and the American people.  His commitment to bipartisanship in the Congress will be vital to this Committee’s work to modernize our institution.

“This November, the American people called for a Congress that would be ethical, transparent, unifying and responsive to their needs and aspirations.  The Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress will deliver this promise, and advance a House of Representatives that is diverse, dynamic and oriented toward the future.  This Committee will strengthen our institution, recognizing the legislative branch is Article I, the first branch of government, and will help our transformative new class achieve results for the American people.

“With Congressman Kilmer at the helm of this important Select Committee, Democrats will reinvigorate the Congress and return the People’s House to the American people.”


J.P. Note: As I have said many times before, when Congress wants to be serious and do something that they hope will have credibility and be bipartisan they always appoint a committee with an equal number of members from both parties. As is the case here there will be twelve members, six Democrats and six Republicans. The Committee will be charged with investigating and a studying options for modernizing Congress and file a final report at the end of the first session of the 116th Congress.

When will they ever learn that developing critically important legislation is also serious business that demands credibility and bipartisanship? Legislative committees with equal party representation will produce real, lasting solutions -- not one-sided solutions to complex problems that will be reversed during the next party power shift.


(FULL TEXT): Title II. Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress. 

Title II establishes a Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress to investigate, study, make findings, hold public hearings, and develop recommendations on modernizing Congress. Topics for investigation include: (1) rules to promote a more modern and efficient Congress; (2) procedures including the schedule and calendar; (3) policies to develop the next generation of leaders; (4) staff recruitment, diversity, retention, and compensation and benefits; (5) administrative efficiencies; (6) technology and innovation; and (7) the Franking Commission. 

The title requires the Select Committee to provide interim status reports to the Committee on House Administration and the Committee on Rules. It authorizes the Select Committee to report the results of investigations and studies to the House on a rolling basis, along with detailed findings and policy recommendations, and requires a final such report at the end of the first session of the 116th Congress. All policy recommendations must be agreed to by at least 2/3 of the Select Committee’s members. 

The Speaker is directed to appoint 12 Members, Delegates, or the Resident Commissioner to serve on the Select Committee, including two members serving in their first term, two members of the Committee on Rules, and two members from the Committee on House Administration. Six of the 12 members must be appointed on the recommendation of the Minority Leader, including one member from each of the three described categories. The Speaker is directed to designate a chair, and, on the recommendation of the Minority Leader, a vice chair. 

The Select Committee will be governed by Rules X and XI, except as provided in the subsection. The subsection does not extend subpoena and deposition authority to the Select Committee, but authorizes the Select Committee to submit subpoena and deposition recommendations to the relevant standing committees. The Select Committee is required to hold a Member Day Hearing.